Why, in an editorial about toxic tuna sushi, does the NYT feel obliged to explain why sushi is appealing? "New Yorkers have come to love the convenience, taste and aesthetic appeal of sushi." Imagine the same said of pizza. Isn't the fact that a food is readily available enough evidence that people like it? Is sushi-liking so improbable that it must be piece-by-piece (no pun intended) laid out?
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Grad Students Not Plagued By Toxic Sushi Epidemic
Posted by Phoebe Maltz Bovy at Thursday, January 24, 2008
Labels: haute cuisine
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment