As a rule, I don't think that only members of Group X should be allowed to weigh in on issues concerning Group X. But maybe it's not a coincidence that of the three journalists making the case that the battles over contraception have "nothing to do with sex, women, or birth control" but are in fact about the broader health-care debate are dudes. Meanwhile, why not make the case that this is in part about broader issues to do with health care? It's the "nothing" that grates. Grates, that is, because it's typical that when some issue relates to women, we're asked to look at the real issues beneath, as if the question of whether or not women seriously risk pregnancy every time they have sex is somehow fluff.
Monday, March 05, 2012
Real issues vs. women's issues
Posted by Phoebe Maltz Bovy at Monday, March 05, 2012
Labels: gender studies, US politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment