Frank Rich has all sorts of things to say about the Imus debacle, although as someone who hadn't heard of Imus prior to said debacle, I'm not all that interested. What is interesting is his citation of, "My 22-year-old son, a humor writer who finds Imus an anachronistic and unfunny throwback to the racial-insult humor of the Frank Sinatra-Sammy Davis Jr. Rat Pack ilk..." The words "humor writer" link to this article in the New Yorker by one Simon Rich. I hadn't noticed the name when I originally read it, just found it remarkably unfunny, even by Chicago Maroon standards, which are not, as it happens, New Yorker standards. I love how Rich mentions that his son is 22, as though to show what a prodigy he is, already writing for the New Yorker at that age!
Justice indeed. This is a country of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton(?), and one where the commonly-held assumption that meritocracy matters leads New Yorker readers to believe that this Simon Rich who wrote an article they're reading got where he is because he's just that much more talented than everyone else who wouldn't mind a piece in the New Yorker. Life isn't fair, which is fine, but it's when we assume it is that things begin to crumble.
Sunday, April 15, 2007
From the 'life isn't fair' department
Posted by Phoebe Maltz Bovy at Sunday, April 15, 2007
Labels: life isn't fair
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
"My 22-year-old son, a humor writer who finds Imus an anachronistic and unfunny throwback to the racial-insult humor of the Frank Sinatra-Sammy Davis Jr. Rat Pack ilk..." Now that's anachronistic, given the Sinatra-Davis-Rat Pack bunch were very pro civil rights and broke a lot of color barriers in their day. Imus was sort of a Howard Stern meets Jack Palance sort of character -- not funny, very cranky. Given the money he's made for The Organization, I presume he'll resurface somewhere. Huggs & Kisses! JP3 in Seattle
Post a Comment