Sunday, March 06, 2005

Hipsters, dipsters

The NYT has a piece that sums up, more succinctly than I'd ever thought possible, what hipsters are all about. Two women, Eve Sibley and Siri Wilson, are on a mission to make sure that Williamsburg stays hipster. A noble cause, and who wouldn't wish them luck?

In December, they went to a community board meeting where local residents were packed to the rafters, expressing outrage over the [waterfront development] plan. "There were old Polish women, Puerto Ricans, Hasidic Jews," Ms. Sibley recalled. "Everyone who's been living here for years and makes this neighborhood interesting and diverse."

But one group conspicuously absent, they noticed, was their own. "We say 'hipsters,'" Ms. Wilson conceded, "even though the terminology makes us feel funny."

In response, the two women took it upon themselves to act as emissaries to the hipster constituency, and to do so in true hipster fashion. Dubbing themselves the Williamsburg Warriors, they set up a Web site, www .williamsburgwarriors.org, "with the help of this hacker dude I was dating for a second," Ms. Sibley said....

"Siri and I have been partying in this neighborhood for a long time," Ms. Sibley said one afternoon recently as she tapped the ash from her cigarette. "We know our friends care about the community, but they didn't know this was going on."

Ms. Wilson added: "I tell them they're planning 40-story towers and rezoning that would make 3-story buildings into these 12-story monstrosities. All our favorite coffee shops will become Starbucks, and our cute little North Seventh pharmacy will become Duane Reade."

For anyone needing more convincing, the women pull up illustrated renderings of the waterfront proposal on the city's Web site. "Look," Ms. Wilson said, pointing aghast at one computer animated figure. "Dockers!"

Now, Ms. Sibley and Ms. Wilson not only know the name of their city councilman, David Yassky, but they talk about population density, affordable housing and community services as if they were old hands at urban planning. And they have recruited more than a few Williamsburg Warriors from the ranks of the D.J.'s, artists, designers, filmmakers, skaters and students they hang out with.

Yeah, cool man! Puerto Ricans and Hasids are so interesting, and it's cool how seeing them causes hipsters' parents to totally freak whenever they visit. And don't even get me started on old Polish women. If only there were a way to import a few more to the neighborhood, they really add character to a place. Now, no hipster would admit to being a hipster, but seems they've got that one covered. And of course, to "care about the community" means to keep out khakis. Or at least unironically-worn khakis. Because khakis denote lack of a trust fund and the implied existence of a boring office job.

The current Williamsburg boutiques cater to those who want to spend SoHo or Upper East Side prices or higher without losing their street cred. The idea being, if you buy a pair of $200 Camper shoes in a store next door to a bodega, you're more with it than if you buy them at the Camper store in SoHo. If hipsters cared about gentrification because they actually cared about "the people," they'd welcome stores like Duane Reade (a drug store chain similar to Walgreens), which will serve and employ many non-hipster residents, and would turn their noses up at tiny, upscale clothing stores, each staffed by one or two independently wealthy individuals. The half-way, "interesting" neighborhood revival they seek is one that keeps down the poor and keeps the division between rich and young versus poor and old as rigid as possible. The women featured in the NYT piece see themselves as community activists, but do not be fooled.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The women featured in the NYT piece see themselves as community activists, but do not be fooled."But they are community activists. They're just organizing to defend a vision of the community you don't find attractive.

"Yeah, cool man! Puerto Ricans and Hasids are so interesting, and it's cool how seeing them causes hipsters' parents to totally freak whenever they visit."The nicest communities I've ever lived in are ethically mixed...

"If hipsters cared about gentrification because they actually cared about "the people," they'd welcome stores like Duane Reade..."But where are they professing concern for "the people"? That would make them hippies instead of apolitical hipsters.

"The half-way, "interesting" neighborhood revival they seek is one that keeps down the poor and keeps the division between rich and young versus poor and old as rigid as possible."You lose me on this one.

The whole beauty of communities like Williamsberg is the exact lack of "division between rich and young versus poor and old". (And one the best things about NYC's rent control laws is the existence of neighborhoods like that.)

Hipsters are obviously easy to slag. But I thought the two women in the NYT piece were relatively, well, hip.

Anonymous said...

hey Pheobe you're kind of hot, dont you wanna come out and playay?

Anonymous said...

Hi,

As an "activist"--the white, college-going kind that is generally affirmed in the identity of "activist"--I have to say that Petey has some points (albeit obnoxiously made).

"Hipsters" like to think of themselves as separate from gentrification, but they're the leading edge of it. The kinds of things that hipsters value about a community are of course things that the working class would like too, but they represent relative class privilege. When the yuppies move in--or the chain stores--that's the just end of the process that started with the white bohemians.

Of course, I don't think this problem is about individuals. I can stay out of the city and not live anywhere near anything that is on its way to being gentrified, but that won't do anything good. Living in the suburbs isn't really saving any poor people. But it's really about institutions--banks, real estate companies and such--that do the larger stuff involved in gentrification. And it's about capitalism (I admit that's a really large critique, and not one that can be concretely and quickly dealt with). As long as there is a class system, the choice is going to be between crappy affordable housing and gentrified and not affordable. There should be a "really nice but affordable" category.

That being said, though, I think it is important to recognize class privilege, because even if you are modestly well off and left-leaning, you're still the face of oppression to a lot of people (as am I).

Thanks. Hope that wasn't too garbled. This blog seems to be a month old, but hopefully someone's still checking it.

jkennedy @ temple.edu

Anonymous said...

Naw petey. Phoebe pretty much nails it spot on.

I've lived in the Burg for 6 years now. These "Williamsbug Warriors" are a bunch of goofs wearing their 'activism' like a pair of vintage legwarmers. It makes them feel special. They have 0 connection with the local community (largely polish, hasidic, puerto rican), and dont need 'affordable housing', to say the least. The NYT article about them pointed out that one of them (Sibly?) owned a condo in the Gretch building...the same building Hasids had protested. Call it irony, i just call it boring and absolutely typical of people for whom 'activism' is simply an extension of their self-righteous vanity. They are silly and contemptable, and only do this stuff so they have an excuse to throw a 'benefit' and flaunt themselves as moral, artistic, people of worth (unlike dockers wearers).

I bet most of the Poles in the area own dockers.

P.s. phoebe *is* pretty hot. Whats up with that. Please move to NY

CEO