This morning I was all, today's the day I'm going to pitch my grand theory of Lululemon! Expanding, of course, on thoughts here. And then I came across Noreen Malone's excellent Lululemon essay, and, I think that work may be done. Malone gets at the essential - that the appeal of the pants is precisely how they speak to women who aren't endlessly wealthy and who don't look flawless in regular yoga pants. Their existence inspires neurosis in women on the cusp of being effortless wearers of these pants. More importantly, though, Malone's grand theory, unlike mine, addresses what it means that the forces behind haute-hippie-dom (Lululemon, Whole Foods) lean libertarian. I'd always been struck by that, but never knew quite what to make of it.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Those pants
Posted by Phoebe Maltz Bovy at Thursday, November 14, 2013
Labels: haute couture, persistent motifs, vanity
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"More importantly, though, Malone's grand theory, unlike mine, addresses what it means that the forces behind haute-hippie-dom (Lululemon, Whole Foods) lean libertarian. I'd always been struck by that, but never knew quite what to make of it."
Oh, you better be good for goodness sake.
Cuz if you're bad, you'll go to hell, which consists of a 70 comment strong libertarian comment thread where you, and you alone, are responsible for all of eternity to convince the entire thread that public fire departments make for good policy...
I really hope to view the same high-grade content by you in the future as well.
In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my very own blog now
I have a hard time describing my thoughts on content, but I really felt I should here.
Post a Comment